<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UltraDefrag &#8211; An open source defrag alternative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/</link>
	<description>A blog about technology, operating systems, and general computing!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:58:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: blagdebug</title>
		<link>http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/comment-page-1/#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator>blagdebug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/#comment-1220</guid>
		<description>The assinine thing splatters itself all over into windows/system32 without telling you it&#039;s about to do so.  
Totally dumbshit thing to do, about as smart as adobe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The assinine thing splatters itself all over into windows/system32 without telling you it&#8217;s about to do so.<br />
Totally dumbshit thing to do, about as smart as adobe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UltraDefrag: Auf ganzer Linie versagt &#124; WeizenSpr.eu</title>
		<link>http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/comment-page-1/#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>UltraDefrag: Auf ganzer Linie versagt &#124; WeizenSpr.eu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>[...] einen Blogeintrag bin ich dann auf das Programm UltraDefrag aufmerksam geworden. Die Fakten hörten sich sehr [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] einen Blogeintrag bin ich dann auf das Programm UltraDefrag aufmerksam geworden. Die Fakten hörten sich sehr [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnulfo Roberson</title>
		<link>http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/comment-page-1/#comment-1022</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnulfo Roberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/#comment-1022</guid>
		<description>hi
udyig4w9hclqe62k
good luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
udyig4w9hclqe62k<br />
good luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reviews and tips</title>
		<link>http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/comment-page-1/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>reviews and tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 03:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/#comment-777</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

I think a way to test if a defrag utility is working or not is doing a common man test. Since fragmentation affects how files are stored on the hard disk, it impacts considerably on starting programs up. This is the moment when the needed files are not in memory nor cached. 

You should measure how long does your PC takes to start up till a certain point (may be showing one splash screen of an antivirus, showing msn messenger log in window, etc)
Besides you can count how many seconds Ms Words (or OO Writer) takes since double click to first blink of the cursor(a that point the software should be almost loaded). This should be done on a fresh reset, if you already ran one the application it may be cached and alter the results. 

After you have done the measures, perform a full defrag using the utility you like the most.

Restart and measure the times again.  I think this work if you have a PC highly fragmented, and the difference should be notorious. 

These are my 2 cents for your blog.

Thanks for support Open Source SW, and thanks for allow me to post in your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I think a way to test if a defrag utility is working or not is doing a common man test. Since fragmentation affects how files are stored on the hard disk, it impacts considerably on starting programs up. This is the moment when the needed files are not in memory nor cached. </p>
<p>You should measure how long does your PC takes to start up till a certain point (may be showing one splash screen of an antivirus, showing msn messenger log in window, etc)<br />
Besides you can count how many seconds Ms Words (or OO Writer) takes since double click to first blink of the cursor(a that point the software should be almost loaded). This should be done on a fresh reset, if you already ran one the application it may be cached and alter the results. </p>
<p>After you have done the measures, perform a full defrag using the utility you like the most.</p>
<p>Restart and measure the times again.  I think this work if you have a PC highly fragmented, and the difference should be notorious. </p>
<p>These are my 2 cents for your blog.</p>
<p>Thanks for support Open Source SW, and thanks for allow me to post in your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nolan phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>nolan phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/#comment-735</guid>
		<description>I think you guys at Open Source rock!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you guys at Open Source rock!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arup</title>
		<link>http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/comment-page-1/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Arup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/#comment-718</guid>
		<description>Long time PD user just dumped PD 2008 for UD as it made a big improvement on my XP 64 system with dual 500GB in RAID. Files open faster, apps do, even FF. Boot speed has increased. What more can one ask for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long time PD user just dumped PD 2008 for UD as it made a big improvement on my XP 64 system with dual 500GB in RAID. Files open faster, apps do, even FF. Boot speed has increased. What more can one ask for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Superalloy</title>
		<link>http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Superalloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/#comment-581</guid>
		<description>Interesting discussion! FWIW, I have a commercial (i.e. not free) defragmenter installed on my workstation at the lab, and it greatly simplifies the defragging process. It oversees and defrags all four drives automatically in the background whenever necessary..usually for a few minutes a day..and without any intervention on my part. Random checks at the end of the day indicate that fragmentation is minimal at any given time, despite heavy file activity during the day, so it&#039;s very effective. Since I don&#039;t have to waste time defragging the drives or leaving on the workstation for the night, it saves me time and some money too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion! FWIW, I have a commercial (i.e. not free) defragmenter installed on my workstation at the lab, and it greatly simplifies the defragging process. It oversees and defrags all four drives automatically in the background whenever necessary..usually for a few minutes a day..and without any intervention on my part. Random checks at the end of the day indicate that fragmentation is minimal at any given time, despite heavy file activity during the day, so it&#8217;s very effective. Since I don&#8217;t have to waste time defragging the drives or leaving on the workstation for the night, it saves me time and some money too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheNerd</title>
		<link>http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/comment-page-1/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>TheNerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/#comment-567</guid>
		<description>I noticed that as well but have no idea why. That&#039;s actually not a good thing. Programs files should use the %PROGRAMFILES% variable to install themselves in the proper directory. 

You might want to contact the guys who write the program or post a message on their forums on Sourceforge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that as well but have no idea why. That&#8217;s actually not a good thing. Programs files should use the %PROGRAMFILES% variable to install themselves in the proper directory. </p>
<p>You might want to contact the guys who write the program or post a message on their forums on Sourceforge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pariah</title>
		<link>http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>pariah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/#comment-552</guid>
		<description>I noticed that recent versions install themselves into &quot;Windows&quot;  directory.  Anyone out there who can give me a short answer about why this is so, rather than Program Files as before?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that recent versions install themselves into &#8220;Windows&#8221;  directory.  Anyone out there who can give me a short answer about why this is so, rather than Program Files as before?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blablabla</title>
		<link>http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>blablabla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themadfatter.com/2008/02/11/ultradefrag-an-open-source-defrag-alternative/#comment-177</guid>
		<description>you guys are arguing about spelling?!?!? god people are dumb, LMAO!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you guys are arguing about spelling?!?!? god people are dumb, LMAO!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
